Follow-up Study of Drug Use, Depression, and Anxiety Reduction and Quality of Life in Addicts on Methadone Maintenance Therapy

AUTHORS

Ali Almasi 1 , 2 , Behzad Hajimoradi 3 , Mitra Mohammadi 1 , 2 , *

1 Social Development and Health Promotion Research Center, Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

2 Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

3 School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

How to Cite: Almasi A, Hajimoradi B, Mohammadi M. Follow-up Study of Drug Use, Depression, and Anxiety Reduction and Quality of Life in Addicts on Methadone Maintenance Therapy, Jundishapur J Health Sci. 2019 ; 11(3):e86427. doi: 10.5812/jjhs.86427.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Jundishapur Journal of Health Sciences: 11 (3); e86427
Published Online: August 4, 2019
Article Type: Research Article
Received: November 15, 2018
Revised: July 14, 2019
Accepted: July 27, 2019
Crossmark

Crossmark

CHEKING

READ FULL TEXT
Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate reduced drug consumption, risky behaviors, depression, and anxiety and improved quality of life in addicts on methadone maintenance therapy (MMT) at baseline and six months after therapy.

Methods: In this descriptive cross-sectional study, 275 addicts were selected by a random sampling method in 2017. The data collection tools consisted of four questionnaires including a demographic information questionnaire, the Beck depression inventory questionnaire, WHOQOL-26, and Spielberger Anxiety Inventory. Data analysis was done by SPSS20 software at a confidence level of 95%.

Results: Based on the obtained results, after six months, MMT efficiency was 50.5% and no cases of intravenous injection were reported. The consumption of other drugs was significantly reduced (P < 0.05). The highest prevalence of depression was observed in cannabis and opium users. Depression decreased from 85.81% to 63.27%. The mean scores of quality of life and anxiety after MMT increased to 89.6 and 20.41, respectively. The most improvement was in the physical health domain (mean score of 64.11).

Conclusions: The results showed improvements in all the four domains of physical health, psychological health, social relationship, and environment and reductions in depression and anxiety.

Keywords

High-Risk Behavior Depression Anxiety Quality of Life Methadone Maintenance Therapy Kermanshah

Copyright © 2019, Jundishapur Journal of Health Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Background

Addiction is a global dilemma that requires serious attention because it affects not only people's physical and mental health, but also social and economic aspects (1). Addicts have no control over the use of drugs and continuous drug use causes health, family, job, and legal problems (2). Obviously, solutions must be provided to deal with this problem. Some of these problems can be addressed with scientific therapies that are suitably stable and prolonged. One of these measures is methadone maintenance therapy (MMT) that keeps the patient in a slow and gentle way of reducing mental fluctuations and improving health. In this therapy, the patient receives a set of medical, pharmaceutical, and psychotherapy treatments (3). MMT does not result in a complete disruption in drug use, but can avoid leaving the treatment and reduce depression, social and familial disorders, death, suicide, serious delinquencies, and unsuccessful marriages (4, 5). On the other hand, the replacement of various drugs with methadone reduces the prevalence of life-threatening diseases such as AIDS and hepatitis C, which are transmitted through injecting drug use. A study by Dastjerdi et al. (6) about the effect of methadone on the reduction of high-risk behaviors showed that 86% of opioid addicts on methadone treatment began to avoid joint infusion and self-harm after six months of therapy, and only 14% continued unprotected sex. A study by Raisi Dehkordi et al. (7) in Tehran showed decreased depression and anxiety and improved quality of life in methadone-treated addicts so that after one month, 48% were not depressed. Moreover, since methadone is an oral drug, it often reduces the effects of addiction, such as liver problems, gastrointestinal tract infections, skin ulcers, and mortality due to drug injecting (8-10).

2. Objectives

Considering the fact that the issue of addiction withdrawal has become widespread in Iran in recent years and it has attracted the attention of many people, especially the youth, this study aimed to determine the efficacy of MMT in addicts referring to Samen Al-Aemmeh center in Kermanshah. We surveyed demographic characteristics, drug relapse, drug use method, depression, anxiety, and quality of life in addicts.

3. Methods

In this descriptive cross-sectional study on addicts referring to the methadone therapy center of Samen Al-Aemmeh in Kermanshah in 2017, a random sample of 275 addicts with an accuracy of 5%, and a confidence level 95% was selected. The data collection tools consisted of four questionnaires. The first questionnaire was composed of three parts: demographic information (age, sex, education level, occupation, marital status, and history of imprisonment), type of addiction (cigarettes, alcohol, opium, heroin, opium juice, etc.), and the method of consumption (ingestion, inhalation, smoking, intravenous and non-venous injections). The other three questionnaires included the Beck depression inventory (Cronbach's alpha coefficient: 0.9) (11), the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL-26) in four domains of physical health, psychological health, social relationship, and environment (Cronbach's alpha coefficient: > 0.7) (12), and Spielberger Anxiety Inventory (Cronbach's alpha coefficient: 0.86 - 0.95) (13). According to the Beck Depression Inventory, people with a score of less than 16 have no depression, 17 - 25 have mild depression, 26 - 34 have moderate depression, and more than 34 have severe depression. The Spielberger questionnaire was designed based on a Likert-type scale that non- anxiety and high anxiety have 1 and 4 scores, respectively. Data were collected in two steps: before the start of the MMT and six months after the start of the MMT. Data analysis was done by SPSS version 20 software at a confidence level of 95%. Data normality was assessed by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The McNemar test and t-test were used to determine the effects of therapy on qualitative and quantitative variables, respectively. Pearson correlation and ANOVA tests were applied to identify differences between the domains of the quality of life.

4. Results

The demographic characteristics of the sample are presented in Table 1. Most participants were in the age range of 20 - 30 years, unemployed (63.63%), single (50.9%), with a history of imprisonment (due to addiction-related crimes) (60.72%), and intermediate education level (57.81%). The independent t-test showed no significant relationship of addiction with marital status (P > 0.05), but there were significant relationships with other variables.

Table 1. Characteristics of the Participants in This Study
ParametersNo. (%)
Gender
Male223 (81.09)
Female52 (18.9)
Age
20 - 30106 (38.54)
31 - 4085 (30.9)
41 - 5062 (22.54)
51 - 6022 (8)
Education level
Intermediate159 (57.81)
Diploma112 (40.72)
Academic4 (1.47)
Job status
Employed100 (36.36)
Unemployed175 (63.63)
Marital status
Single140 (50.9)
Married135 (49.1)
History of imprisonment
Yes167 (60.72)
No108 (39.27)

The data about the type of addiction before MMT indicated that 96 (34.9%) participants consumed 15 cigarettes a day. Other drug use consumptions per day were reported as follows: 133 (48.4%) participants consumed 1 g Hashish, 130 (47.3%) participants consumed 1 g opium, 82 (29.8%) participants consumed 1 g heroin, 64 (23.3%) participants consumed opium juice, 33% (12%) participants consumed 1 g amphetamines, 96 (34.9%) participants consumed one sedative tablet, 91 (33.1%) participants consumed 1 of crack, 25 (1.9%) participants consumed three vial, and 82 (29.8%) participants consumed one tramadol tablet. It should be noted that some people were addicted to more than one type of drugs. In general, the distribution of users based on the type of used drugs and the methods of drug use before and after MMT is presented in Figures 1 and 2, respectively. People were treated with methadone for six months. Follow-up results showed that the overall efficacy of MMT was 50.5% so that after six months, 139 patients remained on persistent therapy and did not consume drugs. After MMT, there were no cases of cocaine, grasses, and steroids consumption. Moreover, there was a significant decrease in other drug use (except for smoking) (P < 0.05). No case of non-injection and inhalation use were reported after MMT. Intravenous injection significantly decreased (84.86%) but smoking was still high (98.2%). Oral consumption dropped to 67.5%. Drug reduction rates after MMT were as follows: alcohol consumption, 98.9%; cannabis, 78%, opium, 92%; heroin, 91%; opium juice, 94%; amphetamine, 85%; sedatives, 59%; crack, 87%; Norgesic, 73%; and tramadol, 95%.

Distribution of different types of used drugs
Figure 1. Distribution of different types of used drugs
Distribution of different methods of drug use in this study
Figure 2. Distribution of different methods of drug use in this study

Based on the data of the quality of life assessment in addicted people, significant differences were seen before and after MMT in the mean scores of physical health, psychological health, social relationship, and environment domains (P < 0.05) (Table 2). The differences in the scores of physical health, psychological health, social relationship, and environment domains before and after MMT were 14.55, 8.21, 7.15, and 5.6, respectively.

Table 2. Scores of the Quality of Life at Baseline and Six Months After MMT
DomainBeforeAfterDifferenceP Value
Physical health49.5664.1114.550.001
Psychological health52.0463.258.210.000
Social relationship53.7160.897.150.003
Environment51.1256.725.60.001

The largest mean difference belonged to the physical domain with a mean score improvement of 14.55 while the environment domain had the least improvement (mean difference = 5.6). It should be noted that the highest prevalence of depression was observed in cannabis and opium users. After six months of MMT, the number of people with depression decreased from 236 (85.81%) to 174 (63.27%) (P < 0.05). The mean anxiety score was 39.4 before MMT and 20.41 after MMT, which showed a significant mean difference based on the independent t-test (P < 0.05) (Table 3).

Table 3. Frequency Distribution of Severity of Depression in Patients Referring to the Clinica
Severity of DepressionBeforeAfter
Severe22 (8)18 (6.54)
Moderate 98 (35.63)69 (25.09)
Mild116 (42.18)87 (31.36)
None39 (14.18)101 (36.72)

aValues are expressed as No. (%).

5. Discussion

Various studies indicate the effectiveness of MMT centers in reducing the risks of addiction, e.g., to injecting drug use, and its adverse effects related to diseases such as AIDS and hepatitis (14). Considering the lack of a comprehensive study in this regard in Kermanshah province, this study attempted to evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness of MMT in reducing depression, anxiety, and quality of life among addicts.

The results of the study on the demographic characteristics of 275 addicts showed that most addicts were male. This finding is justified by the fact that addicts are more men than women and that women have more secrecy. In other studies, the proportion of men to women has been often high. In the study by Do et al., 98.7% of addicts were men (15). This rate was reported as 100% in the study by Wang et al. (16). Most patients were in the age group of 20 - 30 years. Other studies in the field of addiction also support this finding (8, 16). This can reflect the high prevalence of addiction among young people. Most addicts were unemployed. This result contradicts the study by Raisi Dehkordi et al. showing that most addicts were employed (7) and is in line with the results obtained by Corsi et al. (17). The level of education in addicts can indicate the role of educational barriers in reducing the risk of addiction. Of course, educated people may have less willingness to attend MMT centers. In the study of Dhawan and Chopra in India (18), the quality of life of addicted people was higher in those with high school education but Baharom et al. (19) in Malaysia had 53.3% of those with university education.

Only 1.5% of the addicts did not mention smoking, which could indicate the strong role of smoking in the onset of drug use. The highest percentage of drug addiction in this study was related to opium. In the study by Behdani et al. Crack drug was the most consumed substance (20). However, other studies in Iran showed that opium was the most commonly used drug (7, 21, 22). The proximity to Afghanistan, the world's largest opium producer, has made it easy to distribute opium in Iran. It seems that the high consumption of opium is also justified due to the cultural characteristics of Kermanshah province for the use of opium in parties.

In this study, after being followed up for six months, 139 out of 275 patients remained on persistent treatment and did not consume drugs. Therefore, the efficacy of MMT in this study was 50.5%. The efficacy of MMT was reported as 84% in the study by Wegman et al. (23) and 20% - 60% in the study by Cousins et al. (24). In the study by Chen and Fujiwara in China, one year after the start of MMT, heroin use decreased from 100% to 17.2% and heroin injection decreased from 89.4% to 14.1% (25). The different success rates in relapse prevention are reported in various studies, which is justified by the socioeconomic status of participants, the type of substance, and the period after which a re-examination of addiction is made.

In this study after six months of MMT, intravenous injection ended and no cases of intravenous injection were reported. The success of MMT was very significant regarding high-risk behaviors such as the use of a common syringe in injection drug users as a way of HIV and hepatitis C virus transmission (26). The results of this study showed that MMT could reduce the risk of transmissible diseases in the community.

Depression has a high prevalence among addicts. In this study, depression was the most commonly observed disorder, which is consistent with the results of Goldberg and Lin (27) and Holmes (28) studies. Over a relatively short period, MMT could have beneficial effects on many aspects of the life of addicts by decreasing anxiety and depression and increasing their quality of life. Substance abuse is associated with a low quality of life. In the present study, the quality of life was low before treatment that increased significantly after MMT. In the study by Haj Hosseini and Hashemi (29), MMT could not reduce depression and increase the quality of life of addicts, which contrasts with the current study. However, Peyravi et al. study (30) confirms the results of our study. In this study, mood swings, changes in social relationships, job problems, financial problems, and chronic symptoms of the disease were among the reasons for stress and low quality of life in individuals. In this study, the anxiety reduced after MMT, which is consistent with Baharom et al. study (19). The results of the study indicated the improvement of quality of life in the aspects of physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment after MMT. The findings are similar to the studies by Baharom et al. (19), Nordin et al. (31), and Xiao et al. (32). Our results showed that the most improved domain of the quality of life was physical health, followed by psychological health, and social relationship while the least improvement was in the environment domain. These results contrast with Baharom et al. (19) and Huong et al. (31) studies that indicated the psychological health domain had the most improvement and social relationship had the least improvement.

5.1. Conclusions

According to the results, it can be said that MMT could be effective in controlling drug dependence and reducing high-risk sexual behaviors. Employment, education level, and imprisonment history were the factors affecting the duration of MMT, which can be strengthened by accurate and timely planning of experts. A significant improvement was made in the quality of life. MMT is promising in the therapy of opioid addiction, which is still a big public health predicament in Iran. Considering the prevalence of addiction in society, the harmful consequences of high-risk sexual behaviors such as the transmission of infectious diseases including AIDS and hepatitis C, increased depression, and decreased quality life in addicted, the development of MMT centers and the encouragement of addicts to use this type of therapy are recommended.

Acknowledgements

Footnotes

References

  • 1.

    Berg CJ, Stratton E, Schauer GL, Lewis M, Wang Y, Windle M, et al. Perceived harm, addictiveness, and social acceptability of tobacco products and marijuana among young adults: Marijuana, hookah, and electronic cigarettes win. Subst Use Misuse. 2015;50(1):79-89. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2014.958857. [PubMed: 25268294]. [PubMed Central: PMC4302728].

  • 2.

    Hall W, Lynskey M. Evaluating the public health impacts of legalizing recreational cannabis use in the United States. Addiction. 2016;111(10):1764-73. doi: 10.1111/add.13428. [PubMed: 27082374].

  • 3.

    Oliveira J, Lopes P, Gamito P, Trigo H, Sargento P, Rosa B, et al. Neuropsychological status of heroin users undergoing methadone maintenance in harm reduction program and therapeutic community. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2015;14(2):141-8. doi: 10.1007/s11469-015-9576-8.

  • 4.

    Victorri-Vigneau C, Rousselet M, Grall-Bronnec M, Bouquie R, Belliot E, Guerlais M, et al. Use of psychotropic drug urine test strips in opiate maintenance therapy: A clinical assessment of its advantages. Subst Abus. 2016;37(4):584-90. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2016.1176979. [PubMed: 27093305].

  • 5.

    Vafaeinasab MR, Farahzadi MH, Razaghi OM, Fallahzadeh RA, Lotfi MH, Akhondzadeh S. Investigation of affecting factors on persistence in the treatment of patients under methadone maintenance therapy in addiction therapy centers, Yazd-Iran. Health. 2015;7(5):606-16. doi: 10.4236/health.2015.75072.

  • 6.

    Dastjerdi G, Ebrahimi Dehshiri V, Kholasezade G, Ehsani F. [Effectiveness of methadone in reduction of high risk behaviors in clients of MMT center]. Shaheed Sadoughi Univ Med Sci J. 2010;18(3):215-9. Persian.

  • 7.

    Raisi Dehkordi Z, Ghasab M, Golian S, Raeisi M, Chybakhsh S. [Effect of methadone on depression, anxiety and quality of life in addicts]. Ilam Univ Med Sci. 2013;22(2):132-9. Persian.

  • 8.

    Gholami M, Alipoor R, Zareie T, Rezaieyan F, Hedayati A. [Frequency of side effects of methadone maintenance therapy in patients referred to Fasa Doctor Shariati Hospital]. J Fasa Univ Med Sci. 2015;5(2):248-56. Persian.

  • 9.

    Weiner SG, Joyce AR, Thomson HN. The prevalence of nasal obstruction as a consideration in the treatment of opioid overdose. J Opioid Manag. 2017;13(2):69-76. doi: 10.5055/jom.2017.0370. [PubMed: 28829521].

  • 10.

    Alinejad S, Kazemi T, Zamani N, Hoffman RS, Mehrpour O. A systematic review of the cardiotoxicity of methadone. EXCLI J. 2015;14:577-600. doi: 10.17179/excli2015-553. [PubMed: 26869865]. [PubMed Central: PMC4747000].

  • 11.

    Sacco R, Santangelo G, Stamenova S, Bisecco A, Bonavita S, Lavorgna L, et al. Psychometric properties and validity of Beck Depression Inventory II in multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol. 2016;23(4):744-50. doi: 10.1111/ene.12932. [PubMed: 26782789].

  • 12.

    Gholami A, Araghi MT, Shamsabadi F, Bayat M, Dabirkhani F, Moradpour F, et al. Application of the World Health Organization Quality of life instrument, short form (WHOQOL-BREF) to patients with cataract. Epidemiol Health. 2016;38. e2016005. doi: 10.4178/epih/e2016005. [PubMed: 26883738]. [PubMed Central: PMC4877517].

  • 13.

    Potthoff S, Garnefski N, Miklósi M, Ubbiali A, Domínguez-Sánchez FJ, Martins EC, et al. Cognitive emotion regulation and psychopathology across cultures: A comparison between six European countries. Pers Individ Differ. 2016;98:218-24. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.022.

  • 14.

    Tran BX, Nguyen QL, Nguyen LH, Phan HTT, Le HT, Tran TD, et al. Expanding co-payment for methadone maintenance services in Vietnam: The importance of addressing health and socioeconomic inequalities. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):480. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2405-y. [PubMed: 28701208]. [PubMed Central: PMC5508786].

  • 15.

    Do HP, Nguyen LH, Thi Nguyen NP, Ngo C, Thi Nguyen HL, Le GT, et al. Factors associated with nicotine dependence during methadone maintenance treatment: Findings from a multisite survey in Vietnam. BMJ Open. 2017;7(7). e015889. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015889. [PubMed: 28716791]. [PubMed Central: PMC5541583].

  • 16.

    Wang L, Wei X, Wang X, Li J, Li H, Jia W. Long-term effects of methadone maintenance treatment with different psychosocial intervention models. PLoS One. 2014;9(2). e87931. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087931. [PubMed: 24498406]. [PubMed Central: PMC3912169].

  • 17.

    Corsi KF, Lehman WK, Booth RE. The effect of methadone maintenance on positive outcomes for opiate injection drug users. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009;37(2):120-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2008.11.004. [PubMed: 19150202]. [PubMed Central: PMC2741097].

  • 18.

    Dhawan A, Chopra A. Does buprenorphine maintenance improve the quality of life of opioid users? Indian J Med Res. 2013;137(1):130-5. [PubMed: 23481062]. [PubMed Central: PMC3657876].

  • 19.

    Baharom N, Hassan MR, Ali N, Shah SA. Improvement of quality of life following 6 months of methadone maintenance therapy in Malaysia. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2012;7:32. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-7-32. [PubMed: 22853701]. [PubMed Central: PMC3570287].

  • 20.

    Behdani F, Hebrani P, Arshadi H. [Epidemiological characteristics of patients in methadone maintenance treatment, admitted in Hejazi hospital, Mashad (1384-1385)]. Quarter J Fundam Ment Health. 2007;9(33-34):53-9. Persian.

  • 21.

    Bosak S, Najafvand S, Mohammad Hasani S, Mazali M, Heydari Kaydan Z. [Prevalence of psychiatric disorders and related factors among addicted persons referred to withdrawal addiction centers]. Mendish J. 2015;6(10):63-72. Persian.

  • 22.

    Kiani Z, Mahmoodi G. [The effectiveness of methadone maintenance therapy in reducing high-risk behaviors and prevention of recurrent addiction in addicted men living in Kermanshah city in 2016]. Commun Health J. 2017;11(1):40-8. Persian.

  • 23.

    Wegman MP, Altice FL, Kaur S, Rajandaran V, Osornprasop S, Wilson D, et al. Relapse to opioid use in opioid-dependent individuals released from compulsory drug detention centres compared with those from voluntary methadone treatment centres in Malaysia: a two-arm, prospective observational study. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5(2):e198-207. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30303-5. [PubMed: 27964869]. [PubMed Central: PMC5657487].

  • 24.

    Cousins G, Boland F, Barry J, Lyons S, Keenan E, O'Driscoll D, et al. J-shaped relationship between supervised methadone consumption and retention in methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) in primary care: National cohort study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;173:126-31. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.12.009. [PubMed: 28232249].

  • 25.

    Chen G, Fujiwara T. Impact of one-year methadone maintenance treatment in heroin users in Jiangsu province, China. Subst Abuse Res Treat. 2009;3:61-70. doi: 10.4137/sart.s2914.

  • 26.

    Tavitian-Exley I, Boily MC, Heimer R, Uuskula A, Levina O, Maheu-Giroux M. Polydrug use and heterogeneity in HIV risk among people who inject drugs in estonia and Russia: A latent class analysis. AIDS Behav. 2018;22(4):1329-40. doi: 10.1007/s10461-017-1836-0. [PubMed: 28699018]. [PubMed Central: PMC5878835].

  • 27.

    Goldberg DM, Lin HC. Effects of the mental health parity and addictions equality act on depression treatment choice in primary care facilities. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2017;52(1):34-47. doi: 10.1177/0091217417703289. [PubMed: 28486877].

  • 28.

    Holmes A. Drug addictions: new insight into causes, comorbidity and potential treatments. Genes Brain Behav. 2017;16(1):5-7. doi: 10.1111/gbb.12359. [PubMed: 28097813].

  • 29.

    Haj Hosseini M, Hashemi R. Addicts' quality of life and psychological disorders (depression, anxiety, and stress) in two treatment methods: narcotics anonymous vs. methadone maintenance treatment. Research on Addicti. 2016;9(35):119-36.

  • 30.

    Peyravi H, Alavi SS, Ghanizadeh M. The effect of compliance with group therapy on quality of life, global function and care after treatment in opium addicted under MMT (methadone maintanence therapy). Iran J Nurs. 2018;30(110):45-57. doi: 10.29252/ijn.30.110.45.

  • 31.

    Huong AGW, Guan NC, Nordin ASA, Adlan ASA, Habil H. Quality of life assessment of opioid substance abusers on methadone maintenance therapy (MMT) in University Malaya Medical Centre. ASEAN J Psychiatry. 2009;10(1):1-11.

  • 32.

    Xiao L, Wu Z, Luo W, Wei X. Quality of life of outpatients in methadone maintenance treatment clinics. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;53 Suppl 1:S116-20. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181c7dfb5. [PubMed: 20104102]. [PubMed Central: PMC2818825].

  • COMMENTS

    LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: